Recently, Michael Bird mentioned Melchizedek’s mother in a Tweet. I was curious to know her name since Melchizedek is such an enigmatic person in the Old Testament.
Here is what Michel Bird said:
Who was Melchizedek’s mother? Melchizedek appears twice in the Old Testament, Genesis 14:18-20 and Psalm 110:4. He also appears eight times in the New Testament: Hebrews 5:6, 10; 6:20; 7:1, 10-11, 15, 17. Before we can know the name of Melchizedek’s mother, we must know a few things about Melchizedek himself.
According to the book of Genesis, Melchizedek was the king of Salem (Jerusalem) and the priest of El Elyon, the God Most High:
“King Melchizedek of Salem brought out bread and wine; he was priest of God Most High. He blessed him and said, ‘Blessed be Abram by God Most High, maker of heaven and earth; and blessed be God Most High, who has delivered your enemies into your hand!’ And Abram gave him one tenth of everything”(Genesis 14:18-20).
The book of Psalms says that when David became king of Jerusalem, he followed the tradition set by Melchizedek and he became a priest of the Canaanite population that lived in Jerusalem. Since David was not a Levite, David continued the tradition set by Melchizedek since he was a king and a priest.
The psalmist said about David, “The LORD has sworn and will not change his mind, ‘you are a priest forever according to the order of Melchizedek’” (Psalm 110:4). Since David was a priest, his sons also became priests, “David’s sons were priests” (2 Samuel 8:18).
The references to Melchizedek in the New Testament are all related to Jesus Christ:
In Hebrews 5:6, the author says that Jesus is a priest according to the order of Melchizedek: “You are a priest forever, according to the order of Melchizedek” (Hebrews 5:6).
Since Jesus was from the tribe of Judah, he could not be a priest because he was not a Levite. Since he was a son of David (Matthew 1:1), he followed David’s and his sons’ tradition and became a priest after the order of Melchizedek. This is what the author of Hebrews says in Hebrews 6:20, “Jesus . . . has become a high priest forever, in the order of Melchizedek” (Hebrews 6:20 NIV).
The writer of Hebrews says something very interesting about Melchizedek’s family. According to the writer of Hebrews, Melchizedek was a man “without father, without mother, without genealogy” (Hebrews 7:3).
The meaning of this expression is highly debated. Some people believe that Melchizedek did not have a father or a mother because he was an angel or some kind of supernatural being. Some say that the Melchizedek of Genesis 14 was a Christophany, a revelation of Christ. This view has no merits since Christ is not Melchizedek but a priest according to the order of Melchizedek.
The real interpretation of this enigmatic expression is found in the words “without genealogy.” In his commentary on this text, Elliott wrote, “ The last words, ‘without genealogy,’ throw light on the meaning of those which precede. Not because we find no mention of the parents of Melchizedek is he thus spoken of as fatherless and motherless, but because he is suddenly introduced as priest, without any token whatever that he held the office by right of genealogy, the only claim familiar to Hebrew readers.”
Melchizedek had a mother because he was a human being. As for the name of Melchizedek’s mother, I have no idea. Maybe Michael knows something that nobody else knows. I am going to ask him the name of Melchizedek’s mother. When he tells me her name, I will tell you.
Until then, Melchizedek will remain a man whose mother’s name is unknown.
NOTE: For a comprehensive collection of studies on the Book of Genesis, read my post Studies on the Book of Genesis.
Emeritus Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
VISIT MY AMAZON AUTHOR’S PAGE
BUY MY BOOKS ON AMAZON (Click here).
NOTE: Did you like this post? Do you think other people would like to read this post? Be sure to share this post on Facebook and share a link on Twitter or Tumblr so that others may enjoy reading it too!
I would love to hear from you! Let me know what you thought of this post by leaving a comment below. Be sure to like my page on Facebook, follow me on Twitter, follow me on Tumblr, Facebook, and subscribe to my blog to receive each post by email.
If you are looking for other series of studies on the Old Testament, visit the Archive section and you will find many studies that deal with a variety of topics.
I’ve been getting your emails for several years now, and appreciate tem all.
I found this one especially helpful, especially the way you approached and explained the topic.
Thanks, and please keep them coming.
I appreciate your nice words. Thank you for subscribing to my blog.
Some would say that Jesus was in the line of Melchizedek because Jesus was different, He had a dual nature which Melchizedek did not-a clear Christophany like so many other ones. Why did Abraham pay tithes to M.? why does Heb. 7.16 say he had an indestructible life? Why would M. bring out bread & wine? Where was the sacrifice if he was a priest?
Some people see it some don’t-what can I say?
For such important arguments in Ps. 110 and Hebrews, it seems very improbable that M. was just a random priest who just appeared. I wonder if scholars are missing a beat.
Thank you for your comment. You make several assumptions in your statement that are not correct.
This is not a Christophany. How can Jesus be Melchizedek when Jesus is a priest according to the order of Melchizedek?
Hebrew 7:6 does not say that Melchizedek has an indestructible life, He was a human being, and every human being must die.
The Bible says that he was a priest, “he was priest of God Most High” (Genesis 14:18).
Melchizedek is priest of El Elyon. Abraham identifies Yahweh with El Elyon in v. 22. Therefore, the God Melchizedek serves is the God Abraham worships. The bread and wine are the elements of a fellowship meal, and the tithe is a sign that Abraham recognizes the priesthood of Melchizedek.
I do not think that your exegesis of the text is correct.
What if Melchizedek was serving a different God?
It is possible. His name means “My King is Zedek.” It seems that Zedek was the name of a Canaanite god.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for your interaction. I never said Jesus was Melchizedek. I believe Jesus is the enfleshed Logos. I also believe Jesus was Yahweh: ego eimi, or the “I am” statements in the Gospel of John. The Eternal Son became Jesus and, previously became manifested in appearances of God in O.T. scripture. I know that not all Christians believe this, but I do. I respect you but disagree with you theologically. To be in a person’s line, means something theologically beyond your formulations. The book of Hebrews demands it since the previous sections demonstrated the exalted degree of this High Priest.
I believe that Jesus is Yahweh and I discuss this in detail in my forthcoming book, Divine Violence and the Character of God. I hope you will have an opportunity to read it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: Biblical Studies Carnival 190 for December 2021 - Reading Acts