The Cattle on a Thousand Hills

Cattle on a Thousand Hills
by Aelbert Cuyp
Wikimedia Commons(1620–1691)

“For every beast of the forest is mine, the cattle on a thousand hills”  (Psalm 50:10).

Those who proclaim a gospel of wealth and prosperity love to use 3 John 2 as the foundation for their theology: “Beloved, I wish above all things that thou mayest prosper and be in health, even as thy soul prospereth.”

This verse has been the foundation for the promoters of the wealth and health gospel.  They believe that God wants every Christian to prosper financially.

Their theology is centered on the riches of God.  The wealth and health theologians teach that God is a God who owns the cattle on a thousand hills (Psalm 50:10) and that he is the owner of the hills also.  They teach that God owns all the silver and gold in the world (Haggai 2:8) and that he wants to share all his wealth with his children.

The late Oral Roberts wrote in one of his books: “God is not poor.  God is not sick.  As you love Him, give to Him, and believe Him, God will supply your needs according to his riches.  God’s riches are laid end-to-end across heaven waiting to be given to you.”

And Roberts proved that his gospel was true when he told his television audience that God asked him to request his faith-partners to give $8 million.  If he did not collect the money, which would imply that Roberts did not believe enough to receive by faith, then God would take him home (here one wonders if God would take him as he “took” Enoch or as he took Ananias and Sapphira).

At the time Roberts made his announcement on his television program, everybody laughed at him.  Many ridiculed him and called him sick.  But Roberts fooled everyone because he raised all the money he needed.  Presto! His gospel was proven right again.

Although there may be some truth behind the gospel of prosperity, the pillars upon which the wealth and health gospel stands are not good.  God does own the cattle on a thousand hills and he is the owner of those hills as well, but God is not an absentee landlord.  God owns all the silver and the gold but he knows also the value of divesting, of deaccumulation.

Today many Christians associate a sizable bank account with God’s blessings.  To many Christians, the life of opulence, riches, and prosperity is equivalent to faithfulness to God.  According to the promoters of the prosperity gospel, God blesses those who ask for prosperity.  As one television evangelist used to say: “The only power is green power.”

The Bible challenges the assumption that material wealth and financial prosperity can be taken solely as the sign of God’s approval.  The Christian organization that needs millions every month just to survive is in sharp contrast with the simplicity of the New Testament church.

The idea of pastors who make a million dollars or more in salary or Christians who crave for a life of riches is a reversal of the teachings of Christ.  Jesus was so poor that even foxes and birds had more than he had (Matthew 8:20).  He asked his followers to sell their possessions and give to the poor (Luke 12:33) because “it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God” (Matthew 19:24).

If the will of God is that every Christian prosper, what kind of God allows faithful Christians in India to be desperately poor?  What kind of God allows dedicated Christians in Central and South America to be hungry?  What kind of God allows faithful believers in Africa to be poor, hungry, and illiterate?

The lifestyle which American Christians live today is directly related to America’s economic system, and many people in the United States of America believe that God was the first and greatest capitalist.

The accumulation of wealth can be the result of the exploitation of the poor who are demeaned by the inhumane policy of imbalance. The degenerate greed that motivates people to accumulate wealth deprives the poor of access to the common good, promotes employment that supports questionable enterprises, and fosters policies that widen the gap between those who can afford luxuries and those who cannot.  That was not the intent of the gospel of the man of Nazareth.

Christians must be aware of the danger of degenerate greed.  The wise man said: “Whoever loves money never has money enough; whoever loves wealth is never satisfied with his income” (Ecclesiastes 5:10).  They also must remember that “some have been so eager to have money that they have wandered from the faith and have broken their hearts with many sorrows” (1 Timothy 6:10).

NOTE: For a comprehensive list of studies on the Book of Psalms, read my post Studies on the Book of Psalms

Claude Mariottini
Emeritus Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary

NOTE: Did you like this post? Do you think other people would like to read this post? Be sure to share this post on Facebook and share a link on Twitter or Tumblr so that others may enjoy reading it too!

I would love to hear from you! Let me know what you thought of this post by leaving a comment below. Be sure to like my page on Facebook, follow me on Twitter, follow me on Tumblr, Facebook, and subscribe to my blog to receive each post by email.

If you are looking for other series of studies on the Old Testament, visit the Archive section and you will find many studies that deal with a variety of Old Testament topics.

This entry was posted in Book of Psalms, Psalm and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to The Cattle on a Thousand Hills

  1. Anthony Chia says:

    Hi Prof,

    1. Good article, well said.

    2. “here one wonders if God would take him as he “took” Enoch or as he took Ananias and Sapphira”, well maybe you need to figure out if Oral Roberts was a believer, for there is so much perversion in the interpretation of Scriptures, that there is mega church leader who says that Ananias and Sapphira were not believers, and so, they were taken the way they were taken! Ha Ha!

    3. “Presto! His gospel was proven right again.”, Well, too many people refuse to accept true occurrences and truth are NOT necessarily the same. And, more true teachers of the faith should repeatedly remind believers NOT to form and accept theology others formed based on experiences, for the correct handling should be to treat our experiences as testifying to theology derived SOLELY from the Word.

    Anthony Chia, high.expressions


    • Anthony,

      Personally, I believe Oral Roberts was a believer. Although I disagreed with his theology, it is not for me to judge the merits of his relationship with Christ. As you said, many believers allow themselves to be influenced by others because they are good speakers and preach a message of prosperity. We must test the spirits and allow God’s Word to teach us the truth.

      Thank you again for your comment.

      Claude Mariottini


  2. Pingback: A few more thoughts on the Prosperity Gospel | The Crossing

  3. Michael B. says:

    It seems just a bit too convenient that the Prosperity Gospel comes from the land of the Almighty Dollar – it sounds like a very blatant example of quite uncritically adopting values that contradict the Gospel. A lifetime ago, there was Jesus as Big Businessman; this is out of the same stable. In both cases, the Gospel is watered down, deprived of its power to question the values of the culture; it’s turned into part of the religion of America, when it is the USA that needs to be called into question. So much for “love not the world” 😦 Where is the Cross in this travesty ?


    • Michael,

      I believe the prosperity Gospel is a denial of the basic message of Jesus Christ. The absence of the cross in the prosperity gospel is a clear indication that some people are not willing to take up their cross to follow Jesus.

      Claude Mariottini


  4. Michael B. says:

    “And Roberts proved that his gospel was true when he told his television audience that God asked him to request his faith-partners to give $8 million. If he did not collect the money, which would imply that Roberts did not believe enough to receive by faith, then God would take him home…”

    “You shall not put the Lord your God to the test” – it’s interesting that Jesus was being tempted by a version of the prosperity argument; the same tendency to distrust God is being tried:

    5 Then the devil took him to the holy city and had him stand on the highest point of the temple. 6 “If you are the Son of God,” he said, “throw yourself down. For it is written:

    “‘He will command his angels concerning you,
    and they will lift you up in their hands,
    so that you will not strike your foot against a stone.’[c]”

    7 Jesus answered him, “It is also written: ‘Do not put the Lord your God to the test.’[d]”

    And compare the echo of this in Matthew 27: “He trusted in God – let Him deliver him, if He delight in Him”.


  5. Pingback: The Finances of Religious Organizations | Claude Mariottini - Professor of Old Testament

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.