Solomon and the Two Prostitutes

The Judgement of Solomon
Gaspar de Crayer
Circa 1620

After Solomon became king of Israel, he went to Gibeon to make a sacrifice to God. There the Lord appeared to him in a dream and said: “Ask what I should give you” (1 Kings 3:4-5). In response to God’s offer, Solomon asked God to grant him “an understanding mind to govern your people” (1 Kings 3:9). After this vision, Solomon was confronted with the case of the two prostitutes, a case which served to illustrate the fulfillment of God’s promise to him. The story of the two prostitutes is found in 1 Kings 3:16-28:

16 Later, two women who were prostitutes came to the king and stood before him. 17 The one woman said, “Please, my lord, this woman and I live in the same house; and I gave birth while she was in the house. 18 Then on the third day after I gave birth, this woman also gave birth. We were together; there was no one else with us in the house, only the two of us were in the house. 19 Then this woman’s son died in the night, because she lay on him. 20 She got up in the middle of the night and took my son from beside me while your servant slept. She laid him at her breast, and laid her dead son at my breast. 21 When I rose in the morning to nurse my son, I saw that he was dead; but when I looked at him closely in the morning, clearly it was not the son I had borne.” 22 But the other woman said, “No, the living son is mine, and the dead son is yours.” The first said, “No, the dead son is yours, and the living son is mine.” So they argued before the king. 23 Then the king said, “The one says, ‘This is my son that is alive, and your son is dead’; while the other says, ‘Not so! Your son is dead, and my son is the living one.'” 24 So the king said, “Bring me a sword,” and they brought a sword before the king. 25 The king said, “Divide the living boy in two; then give half to the one, and half to the other.” 26 But the woman whose son was alive said to the king — because compassion for her son burned within her — “Please, my lord, give her the living boy; certainly do not kill him!” The other said, “It shall be neither mine nor yours; divide it.” 27 Then the king responded: “Give the first woman the living boy; do not kill him. She is his mother.” 28 All Israel heard of the judgment that the king had rendered; and they stood in awe of the king, because they perceived that the wisdom of God was in him, to execute justice (1 Kings 3:16-28).

The story is a legal dispute between two mothers who both claimed to be the mother of the living baby rather than the mother of the baby who had died. The events that led to this legal dispute happened at night while both women slept.

According to the woman telling the story (call her Woman A), the other woman’s (Woman B) baby died at night because she had laid on him. Then, she took the dead baby and exchanged him for the other baby, the one that was alive. When Woman A woke up to nurse her son, she noticed that the child was dead. When she looked at the dead child, she realized that he was not her son. According to Woman A, the dead baby belonged to Woman B. When Woman B did not return the living child to Woman A, the two women came before Solomon to argue their case before him.

The women in the story are said to be “prostitutes.” Prostitution was considered one of the lowliest occupations in Israel. The claim that the women were prostitutes reflects the background of the story since both women were living alone in the same residence, without a husband, and both women were pregnant at the same time.[1] The case came before Solomon because there were no witnesses to corroborate the women’s story. The absence of witnesses to the event is stressed in verse 18. The difficulty with the stories of the two women is that their stories were different and contradictory and this posed an urgent problem for Solomon because the living baby was in danger of being placed in the custody of the wrong mother.

Solomon was challenged to issue an immediate resolution to the problem even though there was no clear way to solve the problem since each claim could not be verified by a witness. In making his decision Solomon had to use the wisdom God had given him in a vision. In that vision, God told Solomon: “I give you a wise and discerning mind” (1 Kings 3:12). In Israel, one of the duties of the king was to judge the people with fairness. In describing the king’s responsibility for maintaining justice in Israel, Isaiah said of the ideal king: “He shall not judge by what his eyes see, or decide by what his ears hear; but with righteousness he shall judge the poor, and decide with equity for the meek of the earth” (Isaiah 11:3-4). In this situation, Solomon could not decide the case “by what his ears hear,” since the two stories were contradictory. In solving this case, Solomon had to use the wisdom God gave him and decide who was the real mother of the living child.

Because of the social condition of the two women, they probably would not find much support within the community, thus, they had to appeal to the king since he was the person responsible for the maintenance of justice in Israel. Although this story is about two women whose lives are considered to be reprehensive by modern standards, the story shows the strong love of a mother for her son, a love so strong that the real mother of the child preferred to give her son away to another woman than to see him killed.

One important issue that Solomon had to consider was that he was listening to the words of a mother against the words of another mother. In the exchange of words between the two women, the two women were shouting at one another. The king, in making his decision, repeated the argument made by the two women (v. 23). In rendering his decision, the king ordered his servants to cut the child in two and give each woman a half of the child. Solomon’s decision placed the life of the child in jeopardy, but the threat to the child’s life helped the king identify the true mother of the child.

Once Solomon’s decision was announced, one of the women, moved by compassion, asked the king not to kill the child but give him to the other woman: “Please, my lord, give her the living boy; certainly do not kill him!” The motherly love of one of the women for her son moved her to make an important decision: to allow her baby to live, even though he would live with the other woman.

The Hebrew word translated “compassion” is raḥamîm, a word that means “tender mercy.” This word refers to the deep love of a mother for her child. The intensity of this love is reflected by the connection of this word with the word raḥam, a word that means “womb.” So deep was the woman’s emotion for her child that some translations say that “compassion for her son burned within her” (NRSV) and “her heart yearned for her son” (ESV). It is this deep feeling for the child that revealed who the true mother of the child was.

The other woman, the one who was not the real mother of the child, interrupted the woman’s speech by saying that neither of them should have the baby and that the king should cut him in two. The heartless words of this woman made Solomon’s decision much easier. It was the mother’s compassionate love for her child that helped Solomon bring the right solution to the conflict between the two women. Solomon gave the baby to the right mother.

Some commentators believe that Solomon knew the true mother of the child even before he rendered his decision. However, the text clearly shows that such interpretation is not supported by the narrative. In addition, Solomon’s command to his servants would be meaningless if he already knew who the real mother of the child was.

But, who was the real mother of the child? Was the real mother Woman A, the first woman who said that the dead baby was not hers or was she Woman B, the woman who refused to give the living baby to Woman A?

The answer to this important question will be given in the second part of this study.

NEXT: “Solomon and the Two Prostitutes – Part II

NOTE: For other studies on Solomon, David’s son and King of Israel, read my post Solomon, King of Israel.


[1] Marvin Sweeney, I & II Kings, Old Testament Library (Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2007), 82.

Claude Mariottini
Emeritus Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary

NOTE: Did you like this post? Do you think other people would like to read this post? Be sure to share this post on Facebook and share a link on Twitter or Tumblr so that others may enjoy reading it too!

I would love to hear from you! Let me know what you thought of this post by leaving a comment below. Be sure to like my page on Facebook, follow me on Twitter, follow me on Tumblr, Facebook, and subscribe to my blog to receive each post by email.

If you are looking for other series of studies on the Old Testament, visit the Archive section and you will find many studies that deal with a variety of topics.

This entry was posted in 1 Kings, Book of 1 Kings, Hebrew Bible, Mother, Old Testament, Prostitutes, Solomon, Women and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to Solomon and the Two Prostitutes

  1. Udoh Aniefiok says:

    The analysis is understandable. However,I expected to see your inferences of the story in the present church circumstances
    Best regards


  2. john Seaver says:

    I was curious to know if there were any deeper meanings to the story. why did God choose to reveal the proof of His gift to Solomon using this story and event. 2 prostitutes, third day, a baby, one dead and one alive, a sword and a King. The story doesn’t have to have a deeper meaning but I wondered if it did. your thoughts


    • John,

      I believe that the story serves to demonstrate that the wisdom Solomon had was a gift from God. I do not believe that the story has any deeper meaning than the one showing Solomon’s wisdom.

      Claude Mariottini


  3. John Rosati says:

    I do not understand the inane questions and suggestion that have been asked or submitted. The word Solomon and subsequent adjective “solomononic”, is often mention during legal debates as being compassionate and just.


    • John,

      Here is what the Wikipedia has to say about your comment: “Solomonic means pertaining to Solomon. It is used specifically to refer to: Judgment of Solomon (“Solomonic wisdom”).”

      Claude Mariottini
      Emeritus Professor of Old Testament
      Northern Baptist Seminary


  4. John Rosati (Los Angeles, Ca) says:

    Did you know that when you use the word “solomonic” as an adjective, most dictionaries and erudite people they say the word does not exist!


    • John,

      Thank you for your comment. Old Testament scholars use the word “solomonic” to refer to things about Solomon. This is what the Wikipedia says about “solomonic”:

      Solomonic means pertaining to Solomon. It is used specifically to refer to

      Judgment of Solomon (“Solomonic wisdom”)
      Solomonic column in architecture
      Solomonic dynasty in Ethiopian history

      Claude Mariottini
      Emeritus Professor of Old Testament
      Northern Baptist Seminary


  5. Manoj says:

    Thank you for your writing, there is a small mistake, you wrote “The story of the two prostitutes is found in 2 Kings 3:16-28:” but the text is actually1 Kings 3:16-28.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.