>Augustine and the Canon

>Augustine (he is also called Augustin), the Bishop of Hippo (354-430 A.D.), in his treatise, On Christian Doctrine, Book 2, Chapter 8, deals with the study of Scripture and introduces the biblical canon as it existed in his day. This list which mentions all the books that should be considered part of the Christian canon was introduced in the fourth century during the Council of Hippo in 393 A.D. This list of canonical books was also affirmed by the Council of Carthage in 397 A.D.

In his book, Augustine wrote:

But let us now go back to consider the third step here mentioned, for it is about it that I have set myself to speak and reason as the Lord shall grant me wisdom. The most skillful interpreter of the sacred writings, then, will be he who in the first place has read them all and retained them in his knowledge, if not yet with full understanding, still with such knowledge as reading gives, — those of them, at least, that are called canonical.

For he will read the others with greater safety when built up in the belief of the truth, so that they will not take first possession of a weak mind, nor, cheating it with dangerous falsehoods and delusions, fill it with prejudices adverse to a sound understanding.

Now, in regard to the canonical Scriptures, he must follow the judgment of the greater number of catholic churches; and among these, of course, a high place must be given to such as have been thought worthy to be the seat of an apostle and to receive epistles.

Accordingly, among the canonical Scriptures he will judge according to the following standard: to prefer those that are received by all the catholic churches to those which some do not receive. Among those, again, which are not received by all, he will prefer such as have the sanction of the greater number and those of greater authority, to such as are held by the smaller number and those of less authority. If, however, he shall find that some books are held by the greater number of churches, and others by the churches of greater authority (though this is not a very likely thing to happen), I think that in such a case the authority on the two sides is to be looked upon as equal.

Now the whole canon of Scripture on which we say this judgment is to be exercised, is contained in the following books: — Five books of Moses, that is, Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy; one book of Joshua the son of Nun; one of Judges; one short book called Ruth, which seems rather to belong to the beginning of Kings; next, four books of Kings, and two of Chronicles— these last not following one another, but running parallel, so to speak, and going over the same ground. The books now mentioned are history, which contains a connected narrative of the times, and follows the order of the events.

There are other books which seem to follow no regular order, and are connected neither with the order of the preceding books nor with one another, such as Job, and Tobias, and Esther, and Judith, and the two books of Maccabees, and the two of Ezra, which last look more like a sequel to the continuous regular history which terminates with the books of Kings and Chronicles.

Next are the Prophets, in which there is one book of the Psalms of David; and three books of Solomon, viz., Proverbs, Song of Songs, and Ecclesiastes. For two books, one called Wisdom and the other Ecclesiasticus, are ascribed to Solomon from a certain resemblance of style, but the most likely opinion is that they were written by Jesus the son of Sirach. Still they are to be reckoned among the prophetical books, since they have attained recognition as being authoritative.

The remainder are the books which are strictly called the Prophets: twelve separate books of the prophets which are connected with one another, and having never been disjoined, are reckoned as one book; the names of these prophets are as follows: — Hosea, Joel, Amos, Obadiah, Jonah, Micah, Nahum, Habakkuk Zephaniah, Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi; then there are the four greater prophets, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Daniel, Ezekiel. The authority of the Old Testament is contained within the limits of these forty-four books.

That of the New Testament, again, is contained within the following: — Four books of the Gospel, according to Matthew, according to Mark, according to Luke, according to John; fourteen epistles of the Apostle Paul — one to the Romans, two to the Corinthians, one to the Galatians, to the Ephesians, to the Philippians, two to the Thessalonians, one to the Colossians, two to Timothy, one to Titus, to Philemon, to the Hebrews: two of Peter; three of John; one of Jude; and one of James; one book of the Acts of the Apostles; and one of the Revelation of John.

Notes on Augustine’s View of the Canon

1. Augustine recommends that Christians read and retain the content of the canonical books.

2. It is clear that in his day the canon was not fixed, since he does not include the Book of Lamentations (see below) and since he speaks of accepting as canonical only those books that were widely accepted by the church.

3. His canon of the Old Testament contains forty-four books. These books are divided as follows:

a. The five books of Moses: Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy.

b. The historical books: Joshua, Judges, Ruth, four books of Kings (1 and 2 Samuel; 1 and 2 Kings), and 1 and 2 Chronicles.

c. Other books which he says are not connected: Job, Tobias, Esther, Judith, 1 and 2 Maccabees, and the two books of Ezra (Ezra and Nehemiah).

d. The Wisdom books, which Augustine called “The Prophets.” These are: one book of the Psalms of David, three books of Solomon, that is, Proverbs, Song of Songs, and Ecclesiastes, and Wisdom and Ecclesiasticus, which Augustine believed were written by Jesus the son of Sirach.

e. The Prophetic books. Augustine lists the Minor Prophets first and then he lists the Major Prophets.

The Minor Prophets: Hosea, Joel, Amos, Obadiah, Jonah, Micah, Nahum, Habakkuk Zephaniah, Haggai, Zechariah, and Malachi.

The Major Prophets: Isaiah, Jeremiah, Daniel, and Ezekiel.

Augustine does not mention the book of Lamentations which was excluded from his list of canonical books. In his list, Daniel precedes Ezekiel, probably following a chronological arrangement of the two books.

f. New Testament. Augustine is credited as the first person to list all the New Testament books as they appear in today’s Bibles. According to Augustine, the New Testament in composed of the following books:

Four Gospels: Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John.

Pauline Epistles: Romans, 1 and 2 Corinthians, Galatians, Ephesians, Philippians, 1 and 2 Thessalonians, Colossians, 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, Philemon, and Hebrews. Augustine accepted the traditional view that Paul wrote Hebrews.

The Other Epistles: 1 and 2 Peter; 1, 2, and 3 John; Jude; and James.

The Other Books: The book of the Acts of the Apostles; and the Revelation of John.

Thus, it seems that the canon of the biblical books, including the New Testament, was almost fixed by the end of the fourth century. Although Augustine rejected the book of Lamentations, Jerome included the book in his translation of the Bible.

Before there was the canonical list of Augustine, there was the list developed by Athanasius in 367 A.D. In my next post I will compare Athanasius’ list with Augustine’s list.

Next in the series: Athanasius and the Canon.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary

Tags: , ,

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to >Augustine and the Canon

  1. >Prof Mariottini, there are difficulties with the books considered to be covered by the simple listing of “Jeremiah.” Very often Lamentations, Baruch and the Letter of Jeremiah were all considered one book with Jeremiah proper, cited as “…in the book of Jeremiah.” I’ve run across this a few times with clear references to all three. It’s not universally the case, but something to keep in mind, that the waters are quite muddy, so to speak.Relatedly, it’s often difficult to tell which books are being referred to as 1-2 Ezra.

    Like

  2. >Kevin,I am sorry for the delay in responding to your comment. Somehow, your comment was not forwarded to me.You are right, I believe that Jeremiah may include Lamentations, Baruch, and the Letter of Jeremiah. I discovered this by doing research on Athanasius. Athanasius includes the three books into the book of Jeremiah. As for 1-2 Ezra, I suspect that the reference is to Ezra-Nehemiah, which many considered to be one book.Again, I apologize for not responding to you comment sooner. I am having problems with comments being forwarded to my email address.Thank you for your observation. Your comments are very much appreciated.Claude Mariottini

    Like

Leave a reply to Kevin P. Edgecomb Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.