The Middle East Media Research Institute has published a translation of an article written by Egyptian columnist Ahmad al-Gamal in which he is requesting that the Egyptian government sue the State of Israel for damage caused to the people of Egypt by the ten plagues mentioned in the book of Exodus.
The article was published in the Egyptian newspaper Al-Yawm Al-Sabi on March 11, 2014. In his article al-Gamal places the blame on Pharaoh and not the people of Egypt, for not allowing the people of Israel to leave Egypt as requested by Moses.
Below are excerpts from the article as translated by The Middle East Media Research Institute:
“I tirelessly reiterate my demand to utilize all measures of the law and of customary law, and all ethical principles, to receive compensation for what the Israelis, Turks, French and English took from us.
“We want compensation for the [Ten] Plagues that were inflicted upon [us] as a result of the curses that the Jews’ ancient forefathers [cast] upon our ancient forefathers, who did not deserve to pay for the mistake that Egypt’s ruler at the time, Pharaoh as the Torah calls him, committed.
For what is written in the Torah proves that it was Pharaoh who oppressed the Children of Israel, rather than the Egyptian people. [But] they inflicted upon us the plague of locusts that didn’t leave anything behind them; the plague that transformed the Nile’s waters into blood, so nobody could drink of them for a long time; the plague of darkness that kept the world dark day and night; the plague of frogs; and the plague of the killing of the firstborn, namely every first offspring born to woman or beast, and so on.
“We want compensation for the gold, silver, copper, precious stones, fabrics, hides and lumber, and for [all] animal meat, hair, hides and wool, and for other materials that I will mention [below], when quoting the language of the Torah. All these are materials that the Jews used in their rituals. These are resources that cannot be found among desert wanderers unless they took them before their departure…”
“The stories of the Holy Scriptures state that the Israelites set off from the [Nile] valley at night and went to the Sinai Peninsula. This is known to be a desert, were there is no use for large quantities of gold, silver, precious stones, meats, oils, fabrics and the like. Therefore it is clear that the Israelites took all these things from Egypt before they left.
Chapter 25 of Exodus, on the [Israelites’] departure [from Egypt], states: ‘The Lord said to Moses: Tell the Israelites to bring me an offering… These are the offerings you are to receive from them: gold, silver and bronze; blue, purple and scarlet yarn and fine linen; goat hair; ram skins dyed red and another type of durable leather; acacia wood; olive oil for the light; spices for the anointing oil and for the fragrant incense; and onyx stones and other gems to be mounted on the ephod and breastpiece.
Then have them make a sanctuary for me, and I will dwell among them. Make this tabernacle and all its furnishings exactly like the pattern I will show you. Have them make an ark of acacia wood, two and a half cubits long, a cubit and a half wide, and a cubit and a half high. Overlay it with pure gold, both inside and out, and make a gold molding around it. Cast four gold rings for it and fasten them to its four feet, with two rings on one side and two rings on the other [Exodus 25:1-12]’…
“[Exodus 38:24 states]: ‘The total amount of the gold from the wave offering used for all the work on the sanctuary was 29 talents and 730 shekels, according to the sanctuary shekel…’ “I call upon everyone with an interest in Torah studies to instruct us on a scientific basis what is the [precise] meaning of the word ‘talent.’ How many grams is it currently worth, what was the weight of the sheqel during those days, especially as it was made out of solid pure gold and pure silver…”
Al-Gamal’s request is without merit for many reasons. To me, the principal reason why his desire to sue Israel for the biblical plagues is without merit is because no court of law can have jurisdiction over an event that happened more than three thousand years ago.
It was the Pharaoh of Egypt and his government who oppressed the people of Israel, but Pharaoh represented the whole people of Egypt, thus collectively, all people who were living at that time would be guilty of the enslavement of Israel. Moreover, it was God who sent the plagues. Would al-Gamal advocate that the Egyptian government sue the God of Israel?
My conclusion is that al-Gamal’s request that Egypt sue Israel for the damages caused by the plague is something than no international court will take seriously. His rhetorical language is only an expression of the nationalistic sentiments that may be developing today in Egypt in the midst of the political upheaval that nation is facing these days.
However, in a world where people want to sue people for every minor offense, it is possible that a lawyer somewhere may take this case and bring it to court.
I doubt it, though.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, share it with others: click the “Like” button and then share it:
Dr. Claude Mariottini - Professor of Old Testament 
Would be interesting though to see the court’s response.I think you’re right, the most likely argument would be jurisdiction on a matter so clearly beyond any reasonable statue of limitations. Imagine however, if the court did take on the issue. Almost any decision would establish legal president regarding Biblical accuracy. The only out would be for the court to rule the scripture as fiction, or at best hearsay. Any other choice would give the Bible credence in a court of law as an accurate account of historical activity.
LikeLike
Dennis,
You make a good point in your comment. If the court declares the story as fiction, then the case has no merit. It the court accepts the case, then this creates a historical precedent for the accuracy of the story. This is the reason no court will accept this case if the case came to an international court of law.
Thank you for your comment.
Claude Mariottini
LikeLike
It was not the Jews who initiated what came against the Egyptians. It was God who called Moses out of the wilderness and sent him to Egypt to set His people free and it was God who sent the plagues. But as with most who are opposed to God, their MO is to attack others because they know better than to confront God with their issue.
God once judged the gods of Egypt, “On that same night I will pas through Egypt and strike down every firstborn–both men and animals–and I will bring judgement on all the gods of Egypt. I am the LORD.” And God will again judge the gods of Egypt, ‘An oracle concerning Egypt: See, the LORD rides on a swift cloud and is coming to Egypt. The idols of Egypt tremble before Him, and the hearts of the Egyptians melt within them. “I will stir up Egyptian against Egyptian–brother will fight against brother, neighbor against neighbor, city against city, kingdom against kingdom. The Egyptians will lose heart, and I will bring their plans to nothing; they will consult the idols and the spirits of the dead, the mediums and the spiritists. I will hand the Egyptians over to the power of a cruel master, and a fierce king will rule over them,” declares the LORD, the LORD Almighty.’
When the Israelites left Egypt after the plagues, their were Egyptians who left with them. Obviously the determined their idols did them no good and made the decision to follow the God of Israel, the God of all creation. When God judges Egypt again, their will be those who again make the decision to follow the true and living God. “In that day there will be a highway from Egypt to Assyria. The Assyrians will go to Egypt and the Egyptians to Assyria. The Egyptians and Assyrians will worship together. In that day Israel will be the third, along with Egypt and Assyria, a blessing on the earth. The LORD Almighty will bless them, saying, ‘Blessed be Egypt My people, Assyria My handiwork, and Israel My inheritance.”
LikeLike
Dave,
Thank you for your comment.
Claude Mariottini
LikeLike
does this guy realize how stupid he sounds? He said it was Pharaoh’s fault for not letting the people go but it was the Israelites fault for the plagues.
if the Israelites could have used the plagues don’t you think they would have left there a long time ago instead of being enslaved for 400 years?
make that make sense the people of Egypt want to blame the people of Israel, but they say it was Pharaoh’s fault for not letting them go.
so then wouldn’t it be God’s fault for the plagues? Are they going to sue God?
and what about the counter suit from the Israelites for all the years of forced labor? Since Joseph was unlawfully sold into Egypt, falsely accused and sent to prison- without a trial, then he was given the power of a second hand in command to the king and the entire nation of Egypt wept for 70 days after he died because he had saved the entire population of Egypt and it was at his hand that all the prophet came into Egypt for him interpreting the dream of a king.
without Joseph’s hand Egypt would have starved to death and would have ceased to exist to this day, but instead it was Joseph’s investments that made Egypt very rich and then Egypt stole that from him and his people.
so the right thing would do to do would be for Egypt to give everything they have left to Israel and likewise perish, because Egypt would have perished anyways.
I’m sure Israel could make some golden bullets.
so now I would like to ask that Egyptian what the record states. Do they believe in a life for a life? Because the Egyptians slaughtered all the Israelite males that were being born at a certain point- not just the firstborn but every male born at a certain point.
God was merciful and only taking the first born out of each household in Egypt but Egypt was not so merciful.
how then do you recompense the murder of the Israelite baby boys and toddlers?
LikeLike
Jenny,
Thank you for your comment. As you imply in your comment, such a lawsuit has no merits.
Claude Mariottini
LikeLike