The Case of Raphael Golb

For those who are following the trial of Raphael Golb and the controversy about the Dead Sea Scrolls, the Huffington Post has the latest information:

A lawyer charged with impersonating a Judaic studies professor online took the witness stand in his defense Monday, offering jurors a history lesson on the Dead Sea Scrolls and arguing his attempts to defend his father’s lifelong research on the ancient texts weren’t criminal.

Raphael Golb doesn’t dispute that he sent e-mails and messages under pseudonyms attacking his father’s critics, but he testified his actions weren’t illegal.

“These blogs were about a pattern of unethical conduct in this field of study,” he said.

Golb spent the bulk of his life around the scroll research and debate because of his father, University of Chicago professor Norman Golb. The scholarly debate is over the ancient Jews who wrote the scrolls, which are more than 2,000 years old and have provided important insight into the history of Judaism and the beginnings of Christianity.

Many academics say the scrolls were assembled by a sect known as the Essenes. Others, including professor Golb, say the writings were the work of a range of Jewish groups and communities.

Golb said he believed that his father’s work, which includes a book called “Who Wrote the Dead Sea Scrolls?” has been stolen in part by a rival professor, Lawrence Schiffman, and that his research was being wrongly discredited, so he took to the Internet to avenge him.

“I was aware of my father’s feelings of being violated,” he said. “They were constantly making nasty remarks about my father.”

Schiffman, chairman of New York University’s Skirball Department of Hebrew and Judaic Studies, told the jury earlier that he and Norman Golb have long disagreed, albeit cordially, about the issue. But the disagreement so angered Raphael Golb, prosecutors said, that he mounted an elaborate, cloaked effort to promote his father’s side by creating aliases and then crafting blog posts and e-mails to tarnish Schiffman’s reputation

Read the article in its entirety by visiting the Huffington Post here.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary

This entry was posted in Dead Sea Scrolls and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to The Case of Raphael Golb

  1. >For those interested in learning more about the underlying issues at hand in the Golb case, there is a fascinating and detailed rebuttal by Prof. Norman Golb of a "confidential" letter written by Prof. Lawrence Schiffman to NYU, which can be viewed online at: http://oi.uchicago.edu/pdf/schiffman_responce_2010nov30.pdf. This rebuttal takes apart each of the key statements made in Schiffman's letter, in particular, demonstrating that the allegations of plagiarism against Schiffman were longstanding issues that had never been adequately addressed within the academic sphere.

    Like

  2. >For those interested in learning more about the underlying issues at hand in the Golb case, there is a fascinating and detailed rebuttal by Prof. Norman Golb of a "confidential" letter written by Prof. Lawrence Schiffman to NYU, which can be viewed online at: http://oi.uchicago.edu/pdf/schiffman_responce_2010nov30.pdf. This rebuttal takes apart each of the key statements made in Schiffman's letter, in particular, demonstrating that the allegations of plagiarism against Schiffman were longstanding issues that had never been adequately addressed within the academic sphere.

    Like

  3. Unknown's avatar Anonymous says:

    >There appears to be a typo in the above link to Dr. Golb's response to Schiffman's "confidential" letter to NYU officials. The correct link is:http://oi.uchicago.edu/pdf/schiffman_response_2010nov30.pdf

    Like

  4. Unknown's avatar Anonymous says:

    >Raphael Golb's insightful account of his trial can be read at:http://www.sirpeterscott.com/images/golbstatement.pdf

    Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.