>The Washington Post is reporting that a federal judge has cleared the way for government officials and ministers to pray and make references to God during the swearing-in of President-elect Barack Obama on Tuesday.
According to the Post,
U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton refused to grant an injunction preventing such references in a lawsuit brought by a group of atheists. The atheists had argued that the use of prayer and the words “so help me God” by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. while administering the oath of office violated their Constitutional rights. Walton ruled that he did not have the power to prevent Obama from making such references or inviting ministers on stage to offer prayers.
The group of atheists, led by Californian Michael A. Newdow, sued Roberts, several officials in charge of inaugural festivities, the Rev. Joseph E. Lowery and megachurch pastor Rick Warren.
They filed the complaint in U.S. District Court. Newdow failed in similar lawsuits to remove prayer from President Bush’s swearing-in ceremonies in 2001 and 2005.
Roberts will administer the oath of office to Obama at the Jan. 20 ceremony. Warren and Lowery are scheduled to deliver the invocation and benediction, respectively.
Newdow and others urged Walton to prevent Roberst from using the phrase “so help me God” in the inaugural oath. They said those words have no place in the Constitution and had been used only “intermittantly” in the oath until 1933 with President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s inauguration. They called the use of “so help me God” an “unauthorized alteration” by the chief justice of the Supreme Court, who administers the oath.
The decision of the court reflects the sentiment of the majority of the American people.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
Tags: Atheism, Atheists, God,
var addthis_pub = ‘claude mariottini’;

















>On a purely legal level, the lawsuit is preposterous. The Chief Justice says “so help me God” because the president-elect wishes him to. It’s a matter of freedom OF religion for him to be able to end his oath by invoking God.This is just another example of an atheist assuming his right of non-belief grants him the right to deny others their relationship with the Lord.
LikeLike
>Nate,I agree with you. Freedom of religion means that any atheist has the freedom not to believe in God, the same freedom that gives the believer the option to believe in God.When an atheist tries to stop a believer from invoking the name of God, he is trying to eliminate religious freedom and impose his view on others.Thank you for visiting my blog.Claude Mariottini
LikeLike