A Winnipeg case currently winding its way to its grim conclusion pits the children of Samuel Golubchuk against doctors at the Salvation Army Grace General Hospital. According to the leadings, Golubchuk’s doctors informed his children that their 84-year-old father is “in the process of dying” and that they intended to hasten the process by removing his ventilation, and if that proved insufficient to kill him quickly, to also remove his feeding tube. In the event that the patient showed discomfort during these procedures, the chief of the hospital’s ICU unit stated in his affidavit that he would administer morphine.
Golubchuk is an Orthodox Jew, as are his children. The latter have adamantly opposed his removal from the ventilator and feeding tube, on the grounds that Jewish law expressly forbids any action designed to shorten life, and that if their father could express his wishes, he would oppose the doctors acting to deliberately terminate his life.
In response, the director of the ICU informed Golubchuk’s children that neither their father’s wishes nor their own are relevant, and he would do whatever he decided was appropriate. Bill Olson, counsel for the ICU director, told the Canadian Broadcasting Company that physicians have the sole right to make decisions about treatment — even if it goes against a patient’s religious beliefs — and that “there is no right to a continuation of treatment.”
I agree with Rosenblum when he said that to give doctors absolute power to decide when to terminate life is “an assault on the traditional Judeo-Christian concept of the sanctity of life.” Human beings are created in the image and likeness of God and each life is precious and important. Doctors should not be the only ones to decide when life should be terminated. The patient and their families should have a say in the matter.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
Tags: Death, Living Wills, Terminal Illness


















>Claude, I have taken issue with one central point in this post at some length. I find myself doubting that it is quite the issue you take it to be. Thanks, however, for giving much food for thought.
LikeLike
>Doug,Thank you for your comment. I apologize for my delay in answering your comments. I havewritten a post dealing with theright to live and the right to die. You and I are not too far apart on our views. Thank you for your stimulating post.Claude Mariottini
LikeLike