>Bob Dylan, a singer that is considered to be one of the greatest musicians in the history of recorded music, is 65 years old. He has recorded forty-four albums and his songs have made an impact on the lives of millions of people.
Bob Dylan has recorded a new album, “Modern Times.” This new album will be released in the next few days, but it has already received mixed reviews. One reviewer said that the album is disappointing, while another said that it is powerful and the work of a master songwriter.
I have to confess that I am not a Bob Dylan fan, and if tortured to the point of death, I could not name the title of any of Dylan’s songs. The only thing I know about Bob Dylan is that he has an Old Testament rasp and I wrote about it here.
In his review of “Modern Times,” Jim DeRogatis, pop music critic for the Chicago Sun-Times wrote:
Any real Dylan fan knows better than to expect truth in advertising from this musical icon, perverse imp and arch-ironist nonpareil, and “Modern Times” is in fact one of the most retro albums he’s ever made. The music is firmly rooted in his beloved country-blues and other sounds predating the rock ‘n’ roll explosion that began in the second half of the last century, while the lyrics — with a few notable and jarring exceptions — are steeped in Old Testament visions of a harsh and sometimes vindictive God, with the biggest hope of redemption coming not in the afterlife but in the arms of one’s true love, here and now.
Read the review by clicking here.
I may know nothing about Bob Dylan, but I know a lot about the God of the Old Testament. The statement that the God of the Old Testament is “a harsh and sometimes vindictive God” is too one sided.
In the past several months I have read over and over again that the God of the Old Testament is a harsh, vindictive, violent, and an evil God, whose only purpose is to bring punishment upon innocent people, especially women and children.
This view of God is one sided for two reasons. First, it fails to realize the true nature of the God of the Old Testament. In the book of Jonah we read that the God of the Old Testament is “a merciful and compassionate God, slow to get angry and filled with unfailing love.” The God of the Old Testament is also “eager to turn back from destroying people” (Jonah 4:2).
This is the true nature of the God of the Old Testament and the true nature of God never appears in secular newspapers, radio, or television. The true nature of God never appears in blogs that are written to discredit Christianity, the Bible, and God.
The second reason the view that the Gold of the Old Testament is “a harsh and sometimes vindictive God” is one sided is because it fails to look at the reality of sin, of rebellion, of disobedience. We live in a society where sin is a “no no” word and people are unwilling to face the fact that there is sin and sin brings consequences.
How nice it is to live in a world where a person can do anything and never be accountable for what one does. When people lose the reality that they are sinners, then there is no consequence to sin. When people fail to realize that there is a Creator, they also fail to realize that they are accountable to that Creator.
One of the greatest statements of freedom and liberty is found in the Declaration of Independence:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
The only reason we have these unalienable rights is because we have been endowed with them by the Creator. We are not creatures of change because those who are endowed with unalienable rights must receive these rights from someone who has rights to give.
It is sad that in Bob Dylan’s songs “the biggest hope of redemption” comes “not in the afterlife but in the arms of one’s true love, here and now.” This view is far from the biblical teaching of the certainty of redemption that the resurrection of Christ brings. As the Apostle Paul wrote: “If our hope is only for this life, we are more to be pitied than anyone in the world” (1 Corinthians 15:19).
In his review of Bob Dylan’s “Master Times,” David Bauder, the Associated Press entertainment writer wrote:
Dylan’s songs are as inscrutable as ever, and listeners are best advised to find what they want in them.
However, if DeRogatis’ review is accurate, one thing listeners will not find in Bob Dylan’s songs is a true representation of the true nature of the God of the Old Testament.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
Tags: Bob Dylan, Modern Times, God, DeRogatis

















>For a professor, I am surprised at the illogical and poorly supported arguments in your essay. First, you suggest that it is unfair to depict the God of the Old Testament as vindictive and cruel (even though he often orders mass murders and other atrocities) just because elsewhere in the Bible he is depicted as loving. Good grief, this is like arguing that Hitler was not such a bad guy because he sometimes did nice things. Next you attempt to solve the problem by arguing that humans must pay consequences for their sins. This ignores the fact that in many cases God is shown ordering the slaughter of thousands of innocent children, babies, and animals, without any apparent connection to their sin–at least not their own sin, and why should they suffer for other's sin? For example, he supposedly killed every living thing on earth in a worldwide Flood a few thousand years ago (putting aside for the moment all the contradictory geologic evidence against this notion)–including millions of children and babies, not to mention millions of innocent animals. Please don't cite "original sin." Why should millions suffer because of what one of their ancestors (Adam) did? Even the Bible claims that children should not suffer for the sins of their fathers. I could go on. In short, you can make all the rationalizations you want, but a thorough reading of the OT does depict a God who is often mean, jealous, petty, ego-maniacal, insecure, and barbaric. He even condones slavery, and the beating of slaves as long as they do not die immediately, but "linger for a day or two." Verses depicting him as "loving" and "merciful" only reveal contradictions, not an answer to these problems. Of course, when a person such as yourself devotes years to a field that assumes Biblical truth, it is probably hard to face these things, or consider that you may have been deluded for decades, let alone helped others swallow the same delusions. To do so would take a lot of soul searching and courage. But many have done so. I finally did after years of struggling to reconcile my the concept of a loving, merciful God with all the horrors and inconsistencies in the Bible. I finally concluded that it was not "God's Word"–but the product of fallible humans, mish-mashed together over centuries, as indicated by extensive historic and literary evidence.
LikeLike
>Dear Gregory,Thank you for your comment. The argument you use is the same argument people who deny the existence of God have used before to attack the goodness of God.The fact remains that the God of the Bible is good, and that goodness is revealed in Jesus Christ.In January I will write a series of posts dealing with disturbing divine behavior and will address some of the issues you mentioned in your email. I hope you will have an opportunity to read those posts so that we can continue our dialogue on this issue.Claude Mariottini
LikeLike