>The exodus of Israel from Egypt is described in detail in the Book of Exodus. The exodus event became the foundation of the faith of the people known as Israel. What the Lord had done in Egypt was the central theme in the worship of Israel and the focus of the traditions that gave birth to the Old Testament writings.
Over the years, many people have tried to understand what happened in Egypt at the time Israel was liberated from the house of bondage. Many books have been written and many movies produced in order to explain the events associated with the exodus from Egypt.
The most recent attempt at explaining the events that happened in Egypt at the time of Moses has been made by the Emmy Award-winning filmmaker Simcha Jacobovici. He attempts to answer some of the mysteries associated with the exodus in The Exodus Decoded, a documentary which premieres on Sunday, August 20, 8-9:30 p.m. EST on the History Channel.
David DiCerto, in an article written for Catholic News Service, reviewed Jacobovici’s documentary. He wrote:
Did Moses really part the Red Sea like it says in the Old Testament? What about the Nile turning blood red or the plagues that finally compelled Pharaoh to free the Israelites from slavery? Did those things actually happen? These are among the questions Emmy Award-winning filmmaker Simcha Jacobovici attempts to answer in “The Exodus Decoded” which premieres Sunday, Aug. 20, 8-9:30 p.m. EST on cable’s History Channel.
Challenging opinions that dismiss those events as myth, the thought-provoking documentary uses investigative journalism aided by modern science to examine archaeological and geological evidence in separating historical fact from fiction.
Jacobovici believes that archaeology does support the Bible, though his arguments are based on a rethinking of the events and some chronological tinkering.
First, he sets the Exodus some 300 years earlier than the traditional timeline – to around 1500 B.C. – and identifies the ancient Israelites with the Hyksos, a Semitic people living in Egypt at that time who, according to the program, suddenly fled the country en masse.
The earlier date of the Exodus proves key to Jacobovici’s thesis, as it places it at the time of the cataclysmic eruption of the volcano on the Greek island of Santorini, the linchpin to many of the theories proposed. Citing documented modern parallels such as the 1986 Lake Nyos disaster in Cameroon, he believes that much of what the Book of Exodus describes can be explained by a chain reaction of natural phenomena, triggered by the Santorini eruption and a related earthquake.
He even has a ready answer for the slaughter of the firstborn by the angel of death: It was a lethal cloud of poisonous carbon monoxide gas released by the geological upheaval.
The problem with Jacobovici’s theory is that the massive eruption of the volcano of Santorini, a the Greek volcanic island in the Mediterranean, occurred more than 100 years before the traditional date for the exodus in 1446 B.C.
The view that the eruption at Santorini caused the massive tidal wave or tsunami that triggered the ten plagues and caused the parting of the Red Sea (or Reed Sea) is pure speculation. To accept Jacobovici’s theory as the reason behind the events of the exodus, one would have to abandon a 13th century date for the exodus, a date that fits with the reign of Rameses II. In addition, one would have even to abandon the traditional date in the 15th century in favor of a date in the 16th century B.C.
Jacobovici‘s view about the Pharaoh of the exodus is interesting. He said:
Could it be that Ahmose’s father remembered the Israelite prince with whom he grew up, and when giving his son the Egyptian name, “Ahmose,” “the moon is born,” chose the name because of a play on words? In Hebrew, “Ahmose” means the brother of Moses.
This information would be very relevant if the name Ahmose was a play on the Hebrew name, which it is not. To play with the significance of the Egyptian name using a Hebrew meaning does not prove who the Pharaoh of the exodus was.
In his documentary, Jacobovici also speculates on the parting of the Red Sea, the location of Mt. Sinai, and the location of the Ark of the Covenant. I am planning to view the documentary to see how Jacobovici comes to his conclusions. However, I can say that, based on DiCerto’s review of the documentary, I doubt that Jacobovici will change the minds of the majority of viewers, if any. Only the convinced will be convinced.
DiCerto concludes his review by saying:
In trying to find a “plausible scientific explanation” for Biblical events, the film misses a very important point: The Bible is a testament of faith, not a history or science book, written by authors who, inspired by the Holy Spirit, were trying to discern and understand God’s hand in the drama of salvation.
You can read DiCerto’s article in its entirety by clicking here.
The History Channel used the following blurb to promote the documentary:
The story of the Exodus invokes an epic tale–Pharaohs and Israelites, plagues and miracles, splitting of the sea and drowning of an army, and Moses. It’s at the heart of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. After much research–working with archaeologists, Egyptologists, geologists, and theologians–filmmaker Simcha Jacobovici concluded that the Exodus took place hundreds of years earlier than thought. With a new timetable, Jacobovici reexamined artifacts and discovered that the traditional consensus on the date was reached without reference to Judaic texts that record the oral traditions. When Jacobovici consulted these texts, they revealed names of people and places unknown to researchers until recently when extensive excavations in the Nile Delta took place. Teaming up with special effects designers, he created a unique digital experience of the Exodus. Blending archaeological findings with eye-catching effects, Jacobovici creates a virtual museum to showcase his discoveries.
You can also visit The Exodus Decoded web page and explore the mystery of the biblical Exodus through the virtual museum. You can also take a guided tour in which the museum presents the evidence used to produce The Exodus Decoded. To enter the web page and visit the museum, click here.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary

















>I just watched this show on the history channel and the information presented in compelling.Worth watching regardless of your religous beliefs.
LikeLike
>Dear Friend,I agree with you: the presentation of the documentary was fascinating. It was well done and the presentation was compelling. However, for those who are interested in the history behind the facts presented, the program presented some information that does not agree with what the Bible teaches. It is difficult to accept the fact that the Exodus happened in the 16th century or that the Hyksos were the Israelites of the Bible.Thank you for your comment. I hope you will visit my blog again.Claude Mariottini
LikeLike
>THANK YOU!!!! I am so thankful for those in the body of Christ who are always armed and ready to defend the bible.Too many Christians are ‘tossed to and fro by any wind of new doctrine’. I am so impressed that at the time you wrote this article, you had not even seen the documentary, but could effectively refute it based on reviews. It shows you posess a vast amount of knowledge concerning the bible and bible history. You have inspired me to continue to advance in my apologetic studies. As shown by this documentary which seems to support the bible, the enemy is getting craftier. But glory be to God; Through His army of mighty women and men of God like you, He shows He is always 10 steps ahead!
LikeLike
>I have not read the entire review by DiCerto, but his rebuttals, and even the blogger’s, sound weak in the form they appear here. Dr. Mariottini states that the some of the film’s assertions are ‘pure speculation’. Every theory is pure speculation at some point. What’s wrong with that? If there was something wrong, we’d never speculate and therefore never progress. The next step is to dig further. Then there is the statement that to accept the theory we’d have to ‘abandon’ currently held, or dare I say ‘speculated’, dates for the Exodus. That’s the entire point. Abandoning notions that are engrained to see if something fits better. The film seems to make a good case. Finally, the article’s conclusion that the Bible is not History – actually it is. If it isn’t we’re all in big trouble. The fact that entire races, until evidence was found in the 20th century, only existed in the Bible says that it is indeed History. It’s a lot more, too, but it’s proved itself time and time again. For now, at least, my vote goes to Jacabovici. Challenging the status quo is not enough reason to dismiss him.
LikeLike
>To Claude,I realize that you do not agree with the timeline for the Exodus in the 1500bce timeline, but don’t forget, they did find hard evidence at the tomb of Bene Hassah, which was linked to the Israelites coming to Egypt to escape famine,timeline 1700bce. Even then they were called AMO Israel, God’s people.The relief in the tomb there depicts Semites coming to Egypt and bringing all they own with them, to escape the famine.Also, Simcha did not expect to find the seals with the name of Yacov pere on them, at Avaris. they did find 9 royal seals with this Hebrew name,Jacob,on them during the 1700’s bce. These were linked to Joseph’s royal seal.Yes I did enjoy this production, and I agree with many of his findings.The things that he says in this production that is speculation is very clear, and those things he finds proof for, is also very clear.I am often sad that men don’t realize that God can do miracles using his own creation, and since he wrote the laws on physics, I think he can manipulate them as he sees fit.God is the best scientist. I wish people would realize that God can do what he likes how he likes. Often there is evidence of his work on earth. Creation is just part of it.On a different note, I grew up in Lombard, IL.Currently I live in Grand Rapids, MI.I am married, with 4 children, and one grandchild.
LikeLike
>Dear Bonnie,Thank you for your comments on my post, “The Exodus Decoded.” You make some very interesting observation.The Beni Hasan tomb painting portrays Semitic people come down to Egypt with animals. They probably were Canaanites who came to Egypt for trade. Their leader was named Ibsha and he is portrayed as “the ruler of a foreign country.” I am not aware that any serious archaeologist has identified these people with Israelites. What the painting reveals is that there was travel and commerce between Canaan and Egypt.As for the date of the Exodus, you can read my post on The Date of the Exodus.Next time you come to Lombard, come and visit me here at the seminary. By the way, I have four sons and two granddaughters.Claude Mariottini
LikeLike
>identity theft is not new
LikeLike
>ClaudeWhat dou make of my devcodings of the Book of Revelationshttp://kd-mains.com/osama-bin-laden-revelations.htmtake a look at the fourth image odwn to se the Sept Eleventh date revealed on the above onehttp://kd-mains.com/princess-diana-dodi-revelations.htmK D Mains aka Mrflicks TVWorlds.com
LikeLike